This is my personal blog. I regularly write about church leadership and infrastructure development, including specifics on
leadership techniques and the details of implementing systems, processes, and methods that enable the church to succeed.

For years, many churches operated with informal staff development systems.
Reviews were occasional. Goals were verbal. Feedback depended largely on personality. Documentation was minimal. And for a long time, that seemed sufficient.
But the landscape has changed.
Churches are more complex. Employment law is more demanding. Staff expectations are higher. Ministry impact is broader. And Executive Pastors are increasingly functioning as Human Resources Directors whether that’s in their job description or not.
If that’s true, then performance management isn’t optional. It’s part of stewarding people and protecting the church.
The Issue Isn’t Corporate Culture. It’s Clarity.
Whenever performance systems come up, someone eventually says, “This feels corporate.”
I understand the concern. The Church isn’t a business.
But clarity isn’t corporate. It’s biblical stewardship.
Clarity around:
Expectations
Goals
Accountability
Development
Documentation
When those areas lack structure, confusion creeps in. When confusion creeps in, frustration follows. And when frustration lingers, culture begins to erode.
A performance management system doesn’t replace pastoral care. It strengthens it.
As Executive Pastors, we’re infrastructure champions. We build systems that protect mission and people. A healthy performance framework is simply part of that infrastructure.
Why Informal Systems Eventually Fail
Most churches don’t set out to avoid performance management. They just drift into inconsistency.
One ministry leader meets weekly with written goals. Another checks in occasionally with no documentation. One supervisor addresses underperformance early. Another avoids hard conversations.
That inconsistency creates three significant risks.
1. Staff Confusion
When expectations aren’t documented and reviewed consistently, staff members don’t know how success is defined. They’re guessing.That’s not fair to them.
Clarity honors people.
2. Cultural Frustration
When accountability varies by department, staff begin to notice.“Why does that ministry get away with that?” Those conversations don’t stay quiet for long.
Consistency protects unity.
3. Legal Exposure
Executive Pastors know this reality: documentation matters.
If a difficult termination becomes necessary, the difference between a healthy transition and a painful dispute often comes down to documented conversations and clearly communicated expectations.
Informal systems rarely produce adequate documentation.
What a Healthy Performance System Actually Does
A well implemented performance management process accomplishes five key outcomes.
First, it clarifies expectations at the beginning of the year rather than evaluating them at the end.
Second, it creates structured one on ones that encourage coaching rather than crisis management.
Third, it aligns individual goals with the church’s strategic objectives so that everyone is rowing in the same direction.
Fourth, it documents conversations so accountability is transparent and fair.
Fifth, it shifts performance discussions from reactive correction to proactive development.
In other words, it builds maturity into the staff culture.
How to Implement It Wisely
Software doesn’t solve problems. Leadership does.
If you’re considering implementing a performance management application, here’s a practical roadmap.
Step 1: Define Your Philosophy
Before choosing any platform, answer this question:
Why are we doing this?
Is the primary goal coaching? Accountability? Alignment? Documentation? Leadership development?
If you can’t articulate the purpose clearly, the system will feel imposed rather than helpful.
Language matters here. Frame this as shepherding staff well, not policing them.
Step 2: Secure Senior Leadership Buy In
If the Lead Pastor doesn’t believe in structured reviews, the process won’t survive.
As Executive Pastor, you must explain that this isn’t about bureaucracy. It’s about stewardship, fairness, and clarity.
Model it at the executive level first. When senior leaders engage seriously, the rest of the staff follows.
Step 3: Start Small
Don’t roll it out to everyone on day one.
Begin with the executive team or department heads. Refine goal templates. Adjust review questions. Test the cadence of check ins.
Work out the friction points before expanding.
Step 4: Train Your Supervisors
This may be the most critical step.
The greatest weakness in any performance system isn’t the software. It’s untrained managers.
Most pastors were never trained to:
Write measurable goals
Conduct developmental feedback conversations
Address performance gaps early
Document difficult conversations appropriately
If you skip supervisor training, the system will feel mechanical and awkward.
If you invest in training, it will feel supportive and developmental.
Step 5: Keep It Simple
Especially in churches under 150 staff, complexity kills momentum.
Avoid complicated scoring systems. Avoid excessive metrics. Avoid over engineering the process.
A simple framework might include:
Annual goal setting
Quarterly check ins
Mid-year review
Annual evaluation
Documented one on ones
Clarity doesn’t require complexity.
Step 6: Communicate the “Why” Repeatedly
People don’t resist structure as much as they resist misunderstanding.
Explain:
This ensures fairness.
This protects everyone.
This strengthens development.
This aligns us with our mission.
When staff understand that the system exists to help them succeed, resistance decreases.
Choosing a Platform
There are several solid platforms available today, including tools like 15Five, Lattice, and PerformYard.
Each has strengths. The right choice depends on your church’s size, budget, and desired level of structure.
But remember this: the toolisn’tthe strategy. The leadership philosophy is.
Final Thought: Infrastructure Protects Culture
Executive Pastors are responsible for building systems that safeguard the mission.
Performance management isn’t about turning the church into a corporation. It’s about honoring people with clarity, consistency, and intentional development.
When expectations are clear, trust increases.
When trust increases, performance improves.
When performance improves, ministry impact expands.
Informal systems may feel easier in the short term.
But mature churches require mature infrastructure.
And performance management, implemented wisely, is part of that maturity.
